GPUsizing
New Member
- First Name
- P
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2024
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Thailand
- Vehicles
- 991.2 Carrera GTS, 992.1 GT3, F90 pre LCI

- Thread starter
- #1
Hi everybody.
I know they are a very different car but please hear me out. We want a fast 4 doors that is somewhat comfortable. I have no range anxiety as I had previously owned M3P and never came across charging issue.
Why Macan GTS?
- Quick
- Sounds Good
- Usable space in the back
- Don' need to carry people in the back
- Holds value better than Taycan (supposedly)
Why even consider Taycan 4S?
- Quick
- Easy to drive after a long day.
- Lower COG so driving enthusiastically should be better
- Very similar price as Macan GTS due to the lower EV tax
- Don't need to carry people in the back
I will not look into the Panemera 4S Hybrid. I drove it at a test drive event. It was like driving a boat, a quick one that is.
Now I have gone through this forum. I didn't want to resurrect an old thread because that is bad for the community or so I heard.
The general consensus is that Taycan Drive better but will Macan GTS will hold value better. I live in a hot climate country. The higher height ride of the Macan is only good for getting in and out since I don't need to plow through snow.
Now comes the value....
We all now see the plummet value of the 1st gen Taycan. I suspect that there will be much less order of the new Taycan because the fear of hefty depreciation. First time Porsche owner will probably consider Macan EV instead of a Taycan. This should drive the sale of Taycan 4S and up lower. Those that don't care about a used car might even go for a 1st gen Turbo for a 4S money. I just don't see how Porsche will be able to sell Taycan as much as its first gen Taycan sales. Of course, there are those that don't care about depreciation but I don't think this population makes up the total buyer of Taycan.
If this speculation is true, would the Taycan still suffer the same harsh depreciation or normal curve line? I somewhat care about the depreciation. I will be using this car for at least 4 years.
What I currently drive...
I currently own 991.2 GTS, 992,1 GT3, F90 M5, FK8. Fill I find this Macan GTS "slow" or "heavy" if I come from these cars? Will I find myself driving Macan GTS only when I need the space and not just driving for the sake of driving it?
Please advise. Thank you
TLDR: I am considering between the Porsche Macan GTS and the Taycan 4S, both of which are fast and have a four-door configuration. The Macan GTS appeals due to its resale value, practicality, and performance sound, whereas the Taycan 4S attracts with its ease of drive, better handling due to lower center of gravity, and similar pricing to the Macan GTS after EV tax reductions.
I have concerns about the Taycan's depreciation, especially observing the first generation's significant loss in value. Considering my current collection of somewhat fast cars, I am also questioning whether the Macan GTS might feel underwhelming in terms of speed or handling. My decision leans towards a car that offers both a thrilling drive and practical benefits, without significant financial depreciation over time.
I know they are a very different car but please hear me out. We want a fast 4 doors that is somewhat comfortable. I have no range anxiety as I had previously owned M3P and never came across charging issue.
Why Macan GTS?
- Quick
- Sounds Good
- Usable space in the back
- Don' need to carry people in the back
- Holds value better than Taycan (supposedly)
Why even consider Taycan 4S?
- Quick
- Easy to drive after a long day.
- Lower COG so driving enthusiastically should be better
- Very similar price as Macan GTS due to the lower EV tax
- Don't need to carry people in the back
I will not look into the Panemera 4S Hybrid. I drove it at a test drive event. It was like driving a boat, a quick one that is.
Now I have gone through this forum. I didn't want to resurrect an old thread because that is bad for the community or so I heard.
The general consensus is that Taycan Drive better but will Macan GTS will hold value better. I live in a hot climate country. The higher height ride of the Macan is only good for getting in and out since I don't need to plow through snow.
Now comes the value....
We all now see the plummet value of the 1st gen Taycan. I suspect that there will be much less order of the new Taycan because the fear of hefty depreciation. First time Porsche owner will probably consider Macan EV instead of a Taycan. This should drive the sale of Taycan 4S and up lower. Those that don't care about a used car might even go for a 1st gen Turbo for a 4S money. I just don't see how Porsche will be able to sell Taycan as much as its first gen Taycan sales. Of course, there are those that don't care about depreciation but I don't think this population makes up the total buyer of Taycan.
If this speculation is true, would the Taycan still suffer the same harsh depreciation or normal curve line? I somewhat care about the depreciation. I will be using this car for at least 4 years.
What I currently drive...
I currently own 991.2 GTS, 992,1 GT3, F90 M5, FK8. Fill I find this Macan GTS "slow" or "heavy" if I come from these cars? Will I find myself driving Macan GTS only when I need the space and not just driving for the sake of driving it?
Please advise. Thank you
TLDR: I am considering between the Porsche Macan GTS and the Taycan 4S, both of which are fast and have a four-door configuration. The Macan GTS appeals due to its resale value, practicality, and performance sound, whereas the Taycan 4S attracts with its ease of drive, better handling due to lower center of gravity, and similar pricing to the Macan GTS after EV tax reductions.
I have concerns about the Taycan's depreciation, especially observing the first generation's significant loss in value. Considering my current collection of somewhat fast cars, I am also questioning whether the Macan GTS might feel underwhelming in terms of speed or handling. My decision leans towards a car that offers both a thrilling drive and practical benefits, without significant financial depreciation over time.
Last edited: