Kingske
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Frank
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2020
- Threads
- 54
- Messages
- 800
- Reaction score
- 216
- Location
- New Jersey and Colorado, USA
- Vehicles
- 2020 Porsche Taycan 4S, 2024 BMW X3, 2014 BMW 3 GT

Yeah, the unfortunate part of engineering a car that needs heavy focus on aerodynamics to reduce battery drain. We don't care if my ICE car gets 19 MPG vs. 25 MPG. But if you release an electric car sub 250 mile range everyone complains.I like some of it but it’s a little too clean in terms of design. I would like a little more drama. Good to see they are investing heavily into the future here.
Your assessment is spot!Yeah, the unfortunate part of engineering a car that needs heavy focus on aerodynamics to reduce battery drain. We don't care if my ICE car gets 19 MPG vs. 25 MPG. But if you release an electric car sub 250 mile range everyone complains.
Personally, for an aggressive looking electric 911, I'd be good with 125 mile range.
That’s exactly what I get in my Taycan while city driving in winter. Can’t say I’m super pleased with this number.Yeah, the unfortunate part of engineering a car that needs heavy focus on aerodynamics to reduce battery drain. We don't care if my ICE car gets 19 MPG vs. 25 MPG. But if you release an electric car sub 250 mile range everyone complains.
Personally, for an aggressive looking electric 911, I'd be good with 125 mile range.
I don’t see that as an equivalent.just like they didn't make an EV Panamera - they made a Taycan…
I'm not a buyer for that. The instant torque and low service intervals have me sold on BEVs as just simpler and better.What is the large Porsche investment into the synthetic fuel development for?
I assumed that was to keep certain ICE models (911) going.
But I may be completely wrong??
Would you not think that synthetic fuel is - like hydrogen for passenger cars - a desperate but futile attempt to redefine sustainable propulsion while keeping some of the old technology alive?What is the large Porsche investment into the synthetic fuel development for?
I assumed that was to keep certain ICE models (911) going.
But I may be completely wrong??
What if the technology is low emission and eventually achieves economies of scale that put on cost parity with other power sources? In that case it might make a lot of sense. Agree it’s a big if, but then so we’re electric cars 20 years ago.Would you not think that synthetic fuel is - like hydrogen for passenger cars - a desperate but futile attempt to redefine sustainable propulsion while keeping some of the old technology alive?