US Justice department to investigate Tesla range claims.

[Vercingetorix]

LOL - okay, you let us know which OTHER semi-comprehensive resource you'd suggest we use to compare charging speeds...

I'm sure we're all ears (and eyes)

I suggest not using any of them. The results cannot be reproduced.

 

[WasserGKuehlt]

I suggest not using any of them. The results cannot be reproduced.

@Zcd1 you laugh (and I do appreciate your comprehensive data set), but _my_ actual consumption is what really matters to me. I would not make a trip plan/decision based on any published data anywhere - that's just fodder for pub talk.

 

[Zcd1]

@Zcd1 you laugh (and I do appreciate your comprehensive data set), but _my_ actual consumption is what really matters to me. I would not make a trip plan/decision based on any published data anywhere - that's just fodder for pub talk.

Thanks.

The larger point that was being made is that these are at least resources that can be used to compare charging speeds and range. The more commonly cited "10-80%" metric lacks any context for what that means as far as actual range gained, and so is largely useless.

I'd never use these charts to determine how far I could drive, but I do use the data to consider the relative charging pros and cons of different EVs.

And as far as Edmunds being "faux data", they at least drive the same route every time, a mix of city and freeway driving and they report the ambient temps as well, so it's much more useful data than most, IMHO...