I was just on Clipper Creek’s site looking for cable management stuff.
EVs aren’t going to save you from prop 65...
https://clippercreek.com/prop-65-warning/?_ga=2.201529745.1297455466.1619303967-562277443.1619303967
So then I was curious if there was a warning for the Taycan also.
And there...
I look at it as...if I had bought a Model 3, or even a Model S for that matter, I imagine I would spend an awful lot of time wishing I was in a Taycan.
With the Taycan, I expect to spend exactly zero time wishing I was in a Tesla.
So, at the end of the day...none of the rest of it really...
It’s really unfortunate. It’s not as simple as ICE. Especially with people installing home chargers. I think basic understandings of charge, voltage, current, power, and energy...along with AC vs DC, and single phase vs 3-phase are all really required to figure this stuff out. And that doesn’t...
I actually find this aspect to be confusing and wish they wouldn’t do it this way. It would make more sense to label by the load rather than the circuit. IMHO.
No. Dave is saying the circuit is a 50 amp circuit but the load is 40 amps.
Both the PMC+ and PMCC go up to a maximum of 40 amps if they are put on a 240VAC 50 amp circuit.
You do not get to use 50 amps. The circuit it’s on has to be a 50 amp circuit though. Circuits for continuous loads...
I don’t have any specific data to back this up, but I would be surprised to find there is a noticeable (if an) difference in those rates.
But considering the max AC charging rate relative to the max charging rate or even the max AC charging rate compared to the average discharge rate during...
Does anyone know actual voltage specs for Taycan motors? 723 may not be nominal. It’s just an average. I’d be surprised to hear they’re clipping the voltage at the low end. I’d assume a lower motor rated voltage and constant current throughout to produce the consistent performance. But I don’t...