I wonder what would be the reason for the worse range?.. I think there is only a very subtle difference in some "inventors" for a faster launch control - otherwise turbo and turbo s are identical?I agree with him having owned a Taycan Turbo for 3+ years and replacing it with a Turbo S WHAT A MISTAKE I MADE !!! The loss in range is diabolical making it unfit for purpose.
I hate it and would swap back in a heartbeat
I have a Turbo but not seeing any differences that would make a Turbo S different in terms of Range. Turbo S actually weighs less: 5,121 lb. vs. 5,132 lb. for Turbo per my printed brochure. The only way I can see Range impacted from one to another would be Wheels and Tires. This EPA range graphic demonstrates that in comparing their stock configurations.I agree with him having owned a Taycan Turbo for 3+ years and replacing it with a Turbo S WHAT A MISTAKE I MADE !!! The loss in range is diabolical making it unfit for purpose.
I hate it and would swap back in a heartbeat
I wasn't being sarcastic, I hate the range on my Turbo S, I went from a 911 Turbo to a 911 Turbo S and loved the change, whereas the Taycan Turbo S is terrible compared to the TurboUh, i think you folks missed that @Talisker was being sarcastic about the video and the range of the Turbo S.