• Welcome to CayenneEVforum! If you're joining us from Taycanforum, you may already have an account here.

    If you were registered on Taycanforum as of August 27, 2025 or earlier, you can simply login here with the same username and password

    If you wish, you can remove your account here.

[FAQ] - PCCB Option - Since it's bound to come up - my thoughts on PCCB's…

daveo4EV

Well-Known Member
First Name
David
Joined
Jan 28, 2019
Threads
45
Messages
1,961
Reaction score
1,267
Location
Santa Cruz
Vehicles
Cayenne Hybrid, 911(s) GT3/Convertable
Country flag
TLDR; EV's (yes even the Cayenne EV) don't have enough stamina on track to warrant PCCB's - and for non-track use 98% percent of deceleration is handled by regen in normal driving (Porsche's words not mine)…

this makes PCCB's a huge cosmetic exercise vs. an actual stopping the vehicle exercise

go in "eye's open" and get them if you want - but let's not pretend on a full-Regen EV you're changing anything about how it stops…

here are historical postings on this topic which has been debated for years…

https://rennlist.com/forums/cayenne-9y0-2019/1422517-cayenne-ceramic-brakes.html#post19563490

Ceramic Brakes have the following superpowers:
  • thermal endurance - no brake fade - although outside of track use it's hard to imagine _ANY_ non-track scenario where that will matter
  • less brake dust - if you're OCD about your wheels and dust and cleaning them - PCCB's are for you
  • lower weight - and since brake are a rotational mass element this has great effect on vehicle dynamics - although on a 5000+ lbs vehicle one could argue it may not matter
  • they look "better" - but I'm not sure if this is objectively true or a conditioned response from Porsche (and the auto-industry at large) marketing them this way
  • no rust on the rotor in winter areas with salts on the road and such
Pad wear is no more/less than steel brakes - and very dependent on driving style and brake usage - you should get equivalent miles driven for PCCB's pads and roughly the same for steel rotors…

PCCB's have the following downsides:
  • limited choices for pad replacement materials
  • _IF_ you have to replace the rotors they are wicked expensive - truly spectacularly expensive - no joke - like could be a $30k brake job if you have to do all four rotors
    • for non-track use it's very plausible that rotors are "lifetime" because PCCB's only "wear" if you get them super super hot - and it's hard to imagine non-Track scenarios where this will happen
    • but _IF_ you have to replace rotors you can buy 4 rotors _OR_ an entire Honda Accord just in parts cost
  • some people don't like the modulation or pedal feel of PCCB's and the pad material vs. the range of options for steel brakes
PCCB's are the best brakes money can buy for a mass-produced automobile - no question - but they are expensive to replace (if necessary) - and it's unclear if there are any actual advantages outside of endurance/high-demand applications.

stopping distance is largely governed by tire-grip levels and road conditions - and there is no statistically significant advantage in terms of expected stopping distance for PCCB's vs. Steel Brakes in non-brake-fade conditions and equivilent tires - tire grip and ABS governs your maximum deceleration (unless your brakes "suck" or are in "fade") - so for the same tires and same road surface stoping distance is the same for steel and PCCB's…

They are a great choice - but all Porsche brakes are excellent and all brakes for all vehicle's pass the following "tourture" test from Porsche as part of vehicle development…see the relevant passage from Porsche regarding the testing they do for _ALL_ brake systems on _ALL_ Porsche vehicle's…

https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/future-cars/a28915025/porsche-taycan-huge-brakes/

A spokesperson told me that every Porsche is required to pass a braking torture test: 25 stops in a row, from 80 percent of a car's top speed down to 90 km/h (56 mph), with every fifth stop involving full ABS. For a car to pass, it has to generate between 0.8 and 0.9 g of deceleration every time.
what is interesting about the quote above is this test applies to _ALL_ vehicles and _ALL_ Porsche brakes - so their steel brakes pass the same test…so unless you're coming to full stop from 80% of top speed 25 times in a row with no pause between "trials" - you should be fine with normal Steel Brakes.

I love my PCCB's - but I can speak from experience that their most significant benefit is their outstanding fade-resistance - and I can also speak from experience that brake fade is _NOT_ an issue for virtually any Porsche brake system off-track, but I can get Porsche's steel brakes on my GT3 to fade after about 25 minutes on track at Laguna Seca - but that sort of usage is hard to imagine in any street driving scenarios.

this topic has been covered a lot - there is no definitive "conclusion" - but if you're taking sides - my position:
  • they can be beneficial on track car due to lighter weight and excellent thermal fade resistance
  • they are super super expensive _IF_ when you need to replace rotors
  • they are mostly a cosmetic choice for any street car that will not be tracked
other's disagree with my "bias" but they also lack any definitive evidence one way or the other - as do I…

it is however 100% crystal clear the absolute cheapest opportunity to get PCCB's is with a factory order - adding them later is super expensive and mostly impractical.

and I must say regardless of any meaningful advantage in normal use - there is no question they are best brakes money can buy - and they are excellent with few if any downsides other than cost - but as to if they are "better" in meaningful way for a street car - that's less clear.

my $0.02
 
OP
OP
daveo4EV

daveo4EV

Well-Known Member
First Name
David
Joined
Jan 28, 2019
Threads
45
Messages
1,961
Reaction score
1,267
Location
Santa Cruz
Vehicles
Cayenne Hybrid, 911(s) GT3/Convertable
Country flag
I consider this post pretty definitive…

https://rennlist.com/forums/cayenne...teel-performance-difference.html#post17645553

I'm not saying to avoid getting PCCB's - they are in fact the best brakes possible - but simply go in "eyes open" about where/why they are better and know what you're spending the money "for" - and they are not better in a way that most people "assume" and Prosche marketing (and others) are more than happy to have their customers live with that incorrect assumption…few if any vendors make _ANY_ specific claims about _HOW_ PCCB's are better, but they clearly market them as the premium high-performance "option" - but leave out any details as to what high-preformance aspect they excel at…
 
OP
OP
daveo4EV

daveo4EV

Well-Known Member
First Name
David
Joined
Jan 28, 2019
Threads
45
Messages
1,961
Reaction score
1,267
Location
Santa Cruz
Vehicles
Cayenne Hybrid, 911(s) GT3/Convertable
Country flag
thanks to @Mr_Marty and @retom - love _BOTH_ the lists for a concise pros and cons list for PCCB's

PCCB PRO's. (Superpowers really!)
+ They are lighter which reduces the unsprung weight of the wheel. This improves handling and wheel dynamics on bumpy surfaces.
+ Rotors are effectively lifetime unless you track the vehicle - so only pads/fluid are expected based on usage (unless damaged as noted)
+ Brake pads have less copper in them now due to environmental regulations. This causes brakes to be noisier. Ceramic rotors reduce noise compared to metal rotors.
+ Much less brake dust since the rotors wear far less
+ They look good IMO, especially if you get the calipers painted black.
+ unquestionably the best brake's money can buy on a mass production automobile
+ brake fade is almost impossible
+ no rust from winter road treatment materials

PCCB Neutrals
# Vehicles with Regen (hybrids and full EV's) friction brakes are used far less due to aggressive EV motor regeneration under braking - given how little friction brakes are used on my 2020 Taycan turbo my next EV will not be ordering PCCB's even if they are an option - Porsche's current briefing on the Macan EV stated that 98% of braking is handled by regen over the life of the vehicle - friction brakes are no longer a high utilization component for non-track usage
# current EV's lack stamina in other component areas such that brake fade due to thermal saturation is not your biggest problem (Taycan can only run full out for about 15 min before battery thermal limits kick in) - you're not going to thermally saturate brakes in 15 min or less - * see foot note

PCCB CON's
- Brutal Expensive if/when comes time to replace rotors - $30k in parts costs alone
- Costly to repair - see above
- They feel a bit different than metal brakes
- are more susceptible to mechanical damages vs. steel brakes - may not be the best choice for an "off road vehicle" given rocks/pebbles etc…
- require warming up to achieve full braking power (although to be fair some high-performance steel pad compounds have same/similar requirements)
- larger rotor size limits wheel choices due to the need to clear caliper size and rotor clearance - thanks @MaxLTV
 
OP
OP
daveo4EV

daveo4EV

Well-Known Member
First Name
David
Joined
Jan 28, 2019
Threads
45
Messages
1,961
Reaction score
1,267
Location
Santa Cruz
Vehicles
Cayenne Hybrid, 911(s) GT3/Convertable
Country flag
Spoiler

* - during testing of the Audi eTron - the regeneration was so effective the vehicle achieved the lowest record temperature ever at the mandatory brake check area 1/2 down the Pikes' peak mountain - the brake rotor were effectively ambient air temperature due to lack of use because regeneration was so effective…

https://www.cnet.com/home/electric-...ric-suv-pikes-peak-regenerative-braking-test/

Quote:
At that point, we had only descended around 2,500 feet, but by then, the ranger assured me, most car brakes are sitting at an easy 150 degrees Fahrenheit, and some are a good deal hotter, with a small percentage already overheated at 500 or worse (at which point they're typically billowing smoke and our park ranger friend orders to pull over and cool). Our Audi E-tron prototype's discs, by contrast, were sitting just a few degrees above ambient temperature. I know, because I dutifully put my hand directly on the disc on and checked, to Dr. Wein's visible satisfaction.
NOTE: the Cayenne EV's regeneration is next level vs. the eTron discussed here - and it's also more powerful than the eTron's mentioned here - so there is even less friction brake usage than represented here.

friction brakes are rarely used on an EV unless you're tracking it…
 
OP
OP
daveo4EV

daveo4EV

Well-Known Member
First Name
David
Joined
Jan 28, 2019
Threads
45
Messages
1,961
Reaction score
1,267
Location
Santa Cruz
Vehicles
Cayenne Hybrid, 911(s) GT3/Convertable
Country flag
OP
OP
daveo4EV

daveo4EV

Well-Known Member
First Name
David
Joined
Jan 28, 2019
Threads
45
Messages
1,961
Reaction score
1,267
Location
Santa Cruz
Vehicles
Cayenne Hybrid, 911(s) GT3/Convertable
Country flag
for my money - this is the one performance option you can "save" on a full EV with massive regen (i.e. regen means less friction brake usage) - PCCB's are largely a cosmetic exercise on ICE vehicle's with no regen…unless you're tracking them…

this option money can be saved or redirected to other options that are much much more likely to make a material difference…

for example active air suspension is much much more likely to make a visceral difference in your life on a daily basis vs. PCCB's…

this is a very very pricey option on an EV with massive regenerative braking capacity…meaning the friction brakes in normal driving go 98% unused…meaning you do not need high-thermal-capacity brakes - and Porsche's nominal steel brakes are EXCELLENT themselves and no slouch…

Porsche Cayenne EV [FAQ] - PCCB Option - Since it's bound to come up - my thoughts on PCCB's… IMG_0052
 
 
Top